Legal Opinion
Harrell v. Nash
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 1942No. 30249PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
G. R. Nash and others, heirs of Joseph Nash, deceased, sued for the reformation of a contract made between them and defendants, F. O. Harrell and Smiley Harrell, and a mineral deed made by the Harrells to them. The trial court reformed the contract and deed in accordance with the prayer of the petition, and defendants appeal.
The material facts are these; On October 8, 1909, Anna B. Johnson, the then owner, conveyed to the public and Oklahoma City & Suburban Ry. Company a strip of land off the east side of a five-acre tract of land in Oklahoma City. Part of the strip was for railroad right of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Davis v. Keeche Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
- F.H. Prince & Co. v. Towers Financial Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Kroupa v. KroupaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Wahby v. RenegarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.