Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1935No. 25268PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

The parties will he referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Plaintiff’s petition alleges in substance as follows: That prior io September 10, 1919, he was the owner of the complete fee-simple title in and to a certain tract of land in Payne county, Okla., containing 127.50 acres, which he specifically sets out by legal description. That on said date the plaintiff and his wife executed a warranty deed to Ellis E. Wheeler, who was joined as a defendant at the trial, wherein said lands were conveyed to the said Wheeler with certain reservations. The deed appears as an exhibit to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Cuff v. KosloskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Dunlap v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Crockett v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API