Legal Opinion

Newbern v. Gould

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1933No. 21501PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ItILE'Y, O. J.

This is an action commenced toy plaintiff in error to quiet the title to 150 acres of land in McOlain county, and to remove as an alleged cloud upon his title, the plaims of defendants alleged to have arisen by reason of a certain instrument purporting' to convey certain mineral, coal, oil, and gas rights to Charles P. Gould. The instrument sought to be canceled is dated November 29, 1918, and reads:

“That M. B. .Hawkins and Francis Hawkins, his wife, parties of the first part, in consideration of one dollar ($1) in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. McGeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Campbell v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Barnett v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Douglas v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API