Legal Opinion

Diem v. Diem

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 29, 1962No. 39555PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.

This appeal involves a disputed boundary line between two rural residential properties, or acreages, comprising a major part of the NWi/4 of Section 18, Township 21 North, Range 8 East, in Pawnee County. The land lies along the northern edge of a paved road, traversed by both U. S. Highways 99 and 64, about a mile west of deve-lan, Oklahoma. It was homesteaded by plaintiff in error’s father, but, a few years before he died in 1944, he agreed to divide it between plaintiff in error (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff), and another son and daughter in parcels of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  2. Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Miller v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Mahan v. DunklemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Hays Trucking Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hedges v. HedgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Reddell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Thompson v. InmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  5. Jordan v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API