Viersen v. Boettcher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
In the trial court, plaintiffs Henry Boettcher and Catherine Boettcher Converse sued the defendants, Sam K. Viersen, R. W. Viersen, Edith Viersen Terry, the Central National Bank of Okmulgee, Oklahoma, and the Cal-Cul Oil Company, a “can-celled corporation”, in an action to quiet their title to the mineral (royalty) interest under a described quarter section of land in Roger Mills County. The Cal-Cul Oil Company filed no answer and took no part in the proceedings in the trial court and did not appeal; the other defendants filed an answer in the nature of a general denial, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barrett v. Board of Com'rs of Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Deruy v. NoahSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Greco v. FosterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Maloy v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Douglass v. MounceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sautbine v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Bailey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Bangerter v. PettyUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Ash v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.