Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Sewall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1935No. 25649. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an action for damages on account of personal injuries sustained by both the plaintiffs in an automobile collision. They were passengers in a car owned and driven by Lloyd Lipscomb, when it collided with a taxicab owned by defendant Diamond Cab Company and driven by defendant Frank Sewall. The defendants answered, setting up by way of affirmative defense contributory negligence and imputed negligence — alleging that, at the time of the collision, plain tiffs and Lipscomb were engaged in a joint venture.

The court submitted to the jury the issue of joint venture, charging them that, if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Olsen v. Peerless LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Daigle v. RudebeckWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Stokoe v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Saad v. LangworthyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Gibson v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Jamieson v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API