Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Spokane United Railways

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1938No. 27186. Department TwoPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was brought to recover for property damage and for personal injuries sustained by Frank Gibson and wife and their minor niece in a collision of their automobile with a bus, owned and operated by the defendant, at the intersection of Stone street and Joseph avenue, in Spokane. Trial of the cause to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. From the judgment entered, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict having been overruled, the defendant appealed.

The verdict of negligence against the appellant is unchallenged. The sole contention of counsel for appellant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Martin v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Boyd v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Perren Ex Rel. Perren v. PressWashington Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API