Palmer v. Jensen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
In this personal injury action, Pamela Palmer asks us to reverse the trial court’s denial of her motion for a new trial. Palmer argues the jury’s verdict in an amount exactly equal to special damages is inadequate as a matter of law because the award necessarily failed to include damages for pain and suffering.
On January 30, 1990, Palmer was driving her Volkswagen Rabbit in Tacoma when the car was rear-ended by a Ford Aerostar mini-van driven by Thomas Jensen. Palmer’s son Shawn, then aged three and one-half, was riding in the backseat restrained in his car seat. Palmer filed this action for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Baxter v. Greyhound Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
- Wooldridge v. WoolettWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Palmer v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.