Legal Opinion
Saad v. Langworthy
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 28, 1929No. 21738. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for personal injuries and damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision with the automobile of the defendant, who, by cross-complaint, prayed recovery for damages to his automobile. The cause was tried to the court. Finding each party guilty of negligence which contributed to, and was the proximate cause of, the accident, the court entered judgment denying recovery to either party as against the other. The plaintiff has appealed.
About nine o’clock of the forenoon of July 30, 1928, the day was bright and the streets were dry in the city of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ward v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Dansky v. KotimakiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1925
- Roe v. KurtzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Breithaupt v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ries v. Cheyenne Cab & Transfer Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Warner v. KeeblerWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Swanson v. SewallWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- McHugh v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Bell v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.