Stokoe v. Paulson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages to an automobile. The defendants de nied liability, and affirmatively sought recovery against the plaintiff for damages to their truck. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, from which the court concluded that the defendants should take nothing upon their cross-complaint, and that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of $350. Judgment was entered for this amount, and the defendants appeal.
The facts are these: The accident out of which the litigation arose happened January 22, 1930, at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by17 opinions
- White v. FennerWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Robison v. SimardWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Massengale v. SvangrenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Tobias v. RainwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.