Legal Opinion

Coppo v. Van Wieringen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1950No. 31209, 31210PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting new trials in two actions for damages resulting from an automobile collision, which actions were consolidated for trial and. are consolidated on this appeal.

On May 1, 1948, Shields J. Coppo and his wife were in the front seat of their automobile and Bill Myers and his wife were in the back seat. While stopped for a red light, *121the Coppo car was hit from behind by a car driven by Martin Van Wieringen.

Mr. and Mrs. Coppo and Mr. and Mrs. Myers brought actions against Van Wieringen for damages. The jury found for…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Knecht v. MarzanoWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Reynolds v. DonohoWashington Supreme Court · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API