Legal Opinion

Meeker v. Shanks

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1887No. 12,958PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The complaint in this case alleges “ that the defendants, by their joint and several promissory note, on the 31st day of December, 1881, ninety days after date, promised to pay to the order of James B. Jaqua, at the Citizens’ Bank, the sum of two hundred and fifty dollars,” and that Jaqua subsequently endorsed the note to the plaintiffs. A copy of the note, which appears to have been signed by the defendants, is made an exhibit with the complaint.

This was a sufficient averment of the execution of the note by the defendants, and the appellants’ objection that the complaint does not allege that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bank of Rutland v. BuckNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Cline v. GuthrieIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Mitchell v. ColglazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Fetters v. Muncie National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. W. H. Barber Co. v. HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Kehr v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Reddick v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Archibald v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API