Legal Opinion

Stix v. Sadler

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1887No. 12,721PublishedCited by 54 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The creditors of Samuel C. Sadler brought this suit to set aside a chattel mortgage executed by him to his wife, Sarah Q,. Sadler. The mortgage was executed, as appears from the allegations of the appellants’ complaint, five days prior to the execution of a deed of general assignment by Samuel C. Sadler to William H. Martin for the benefit of the assignor’s creditors. It is charged that the mortgage was executed without consideration and for the purpose of defrauding the creditors of the mortgagor.

The second paragraph of Mrs. Sadler’s answer alleges that' the mortgage was executed to secure a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Vinton v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. Canada & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Kirkpatrick v. ReevesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Citizens Bank v. BolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Muncie National Bank v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API