Legal Opinion

Reddick v. Keesling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1891No. 15,119PublishedCited by 21 opinions

From the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Coffey, C. J. —

The complaint in this case alleges, among *130other things, that Lucinda Reddick, who was the wife of the appellant, died in the year 1876, leaving her husband and the appellee, an only child, as her only heirs at law; that said Lucinda, during her lifetime, delivered to the appellant eighteen hundred dollars in trust for the appellee, which he agreed to pay over to her, with the legal interest thereon, when she should be competent to receive and receipt for the same; that the appellee became twenty-one years of age in 1885, and demanded of the appellant a settlement of said trust,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Miller v. BillingslyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Ashton v. ShepherdIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. M. S. Huey Co. v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SlaughterIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Ross v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API