Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Colglazier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1886No. 12,131PublishedCited by 27 opinions

From the 'Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The complaint in this case charges that David Colglazier, with the intent to defraud the plaintiff, a judgment creditor, and without consideration, conveyed certain real estate, of which he was the owner, to his wife. The suit was to set aside this conveyance.. Louisa Colglazier answered separately, and the ruling of the court, in overruling a demurrer to her ans.wer, presents the principal question for decision.

The substance of her answer was, that in 1872 she was the wife of David Colglazier, and was possessed of certain moneys and choses in action which were her separate -property,' and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kenney v. PhillipyIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hidden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Doe v. ReaganIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Westerfield v. KimmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Heberd v. WinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Rice v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mendenhall v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API