Legal Opinion

Kehr v. Hall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1889No. 13,587PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

The complaint in this case is in two paragraphs.

The first paragraph charges that the appellee, who was the plaintiff below, was appointed receiver by the Elkhart Circuit Court, to take into his possession and hold, subject to the order of said court, certain property described in a schedule attached thereto, marked exhibit A; that he took into his possession the said property, and, afterwards, the appellants, who were the defendants, with force and arms, wrongfully and forcibly took and carried away said property, and converted the same to their own use, it being of the value…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GainesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bristol Hydraulic Co. v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Mitchell v. ColglazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Picquet v. M'KayIndiana Supreme Court · 1831

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Town of Freedom v. NorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Minnich v. DarlingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Knight v. Laurens Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Meiser, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API