Legal Opinion

Engasser v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1948No. Civ. 3820PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action against defendants to compel specific performance of a claimed oral agreement to sell certain real property located at Nuevo, in Riverside County. It is alleged that plaintiffs paid defendants $1,000 on account of the purchase price, were let into possession of the property, and still occupy it under an oral agreement; that defendants refused to perform their part of the agreement; and pray that if specific performance cannot be enforced judgment be awarded in favor of plaintiffs against defendants for such damages as they have sustained by reason of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Trout v. OgilvieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Messer v. Hibernia Sav. Etc. SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hart v. National Mortgage & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. United States v. Apex Oil Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Burke Investors v. Nite Lite Inns (In Re Nite Lite Inns)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API