Legal Opinion
Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & Sons
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1936No. S. F. 15503; S. F. 15108PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division One. We now adopt the following portions of the opinion of Mr. Justice pro tem. Dooling as part of the opinion of this court.
“Cross-appeals are presented herein from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $2,500 with interest from May 2, 1929. Plaintiff appeals on the judgment-roll alone, claiming that under the findings she is entitled to a judgment for $18,250 with interest. Defendant on its appeal presents a typewritten transcript of the evidence and urges that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Kemp v. EnemarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Lisenby v. NewtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Holzer v. ReadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Greenwich S.F., LLC v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Jones v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Continental Oil Co. v. United States. United States v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.