Legal Opinion

Messer v. Hibernia Sav. Etc. Society

California Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1906No. S.F. No. 3589PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of the Pacific Improvement Company, brought his action for the specific enforcement of a contract for the exchange of land, made by the Pacific Improvement Company with the defendant. Such was his original complaint. Upon demurrer he amended by pleading mutual mistake in the original contract, sought a reformation of it, and prayed specific performance of the reformed contract, or compensation by way of damages should specific performance be impossible.

It was made to appear that the Hibernia Bank held a mortgage on a lot owned by one Philip Freund, having a frontage of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hutchinson v. AinsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. San Diego Water Co. v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeRosenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  5. Hallam v. CorlettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Sheldon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. A. Teichert & Son, Inc. v. State of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API