Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Lemmens

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1964No. Civ. 28134PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

Plaintiffs sued for damages for breach of a contract which had accorded them a preemptive right to purchase a particular parcel of real property from defendant. At the time of purchase of one lot from defendant the parties had included in the deposit receipt the clause, “If seller decides to sell the other 50 foot lot he will give buyer first chance to purchase at $10,000.00.” The receipt was dated June 8, 1955. In the escrow instructions which followed, dated June 16, 1955, there was the following elaboration of the clause: “As a matter of record only, with which escrow holder is not to be…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kahn v. LischnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Johnson v. SchimpfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Southern Pacific Milling Co. v. Billiwhack Stock Farm, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Hood v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. Hartnett v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stoneburner v. FletcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API