Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Lischner

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1954No. Civ. 20240PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

Alleging that the failure, due to bad faith, of appellant to perform under a written agreement for the sale and conveyance of real property, respondent brought an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County for damages for breach of contract and was awarded judgment in the sum of $5,000 and interest. This appeal has been brought on the grounds of insufficiency of the evidence and errors in law.

Negotiations for the purchase and sale of the timberland involved in this lawsuit took place both by correspondence and telephone, and over a somewhat protracted period, since…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Sargent v. ShumakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Windsor Mills, Inc. v. Collins & Aikman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Soliman v. Philip Morris IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API