Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Schimpf

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1925No. Docket No. Sac. 3627PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This action was brought to recover damages, alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, because of the breach by the defendant of a contract to convey real property. The court below sustained a general demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. Judgment was accordingly entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from this judgment.

The pleaded facts in the case, substantially stated, are these: The defendant was the owner of certain real property upon which were situated certain designated buildings, consisting of slaughter-houses, sheds, and corrals, which…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Carpy v. DowdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Preble v. AbrahamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Sparks v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Mercer v. LemmensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Nelson v. Fernando Nelson & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Engasser v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Collins v. Marvel Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API