Trout v. Ogilvie
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion’ of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is a suit in equity to compel specific performance of a contract to make a certain testamentary disposition of property. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals.
The action is of a type illustrated by a line of decisions in this state beginning with Owens v. McNally, 113 Cal. 444, [33 L. R. A. 369, 45 Pac. 710]. [1] Though specific performance, in the literal sense of the term, cannot be given in this class of actions, nevertheless a court of equity, where the facts justify, may grant relief substantially the same as specific performance by treating the heirs as trustees…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Owens v. McNallyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Fritz v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Flood v. TempletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hagan v. McNaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Notten v. MensingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- McComsey v. LeafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bright v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Estate of Van DeusenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.