Legal Opinion
Hart v. National Mortgage & Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 3, 1987No. E002982PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEWS, J.
—The trial court granted summary judgment and/or summary adjudication of issues as to John Hart’s four causes of action against his employer, National Mortgage & Land Company (National). Hart appeals, contending the trial court erred in concluding his first cause of action, for sexual harassment, was not cognizable under Government Code section 12940. We disagree, and therefore affirm that portion of the trial court’s ruling. Hart also contends the court below erroneously concluded National is not potentially liable to him for negligence or punitive damages. We agree with Hart…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Renteria v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Magliulo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Byrd v. Richardson-Greenshields Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Smith v. PrintupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Fermino v. Fedco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.