Bullock v. Rouse
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This action was brought to determine an adverse claim to a piece of land described as the south half of the southeast quarter of a certain thirty-sixth section. The plaintiffs claim the land under a certificate of purchase issued by the proper officers of the state, and the defendant claims it under a certificate of homestead entry issued by the proper officers of the United States. The court below gave judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiffs appeal. The case is brought here on the judgment roll.
It appears, from the findings, that prior to the 21st of December, 1871, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Atherton v. FowlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hosmer v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Middleton v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Hunt v. PlavsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- John Taft Corp. v. Advisory AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Smith v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Rea v. HaffendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.