Atherton v. Fowler
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
.Mr. Justice Miller
delivered the opinion of the court.
• This case originates in an action of replevin brought by Page, who died during the progress of the litigation, and is now represented by Atherton, his executor, the plaintiff in error. The plaintiff below obtained possession of the hay, which -was the subject of the writ of replevin; but, on trial before a jury, they found he was not entitled'to the possession, and judgment for the value of the hay was'rendered against him. This judgment was affirmed on appeal to the Supreme Court of the State, and is now brought before us for review on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- United States v. StanleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1855
3Cited by95 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Miller v. ChrismanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.