Rea v. Haffenden
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real property, executed by the defendant, Albert Haffenden, to secure payment of his promissory .note for seven thousand dollars. The complaint alleges that the other defendants have or claim some interest in or liens upon"the mortgaged premises, which interests, claims, and liens are all subsequent and subordinate to the lien of plaintiff’s mortgage.
Defendant Haffenden suffered his default to be entered. The other defendants ' by their answers admit the execution of the note and mortgage set out in the complaint, and that they…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Middleton v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Robinson v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- McCullough v. OldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bullock v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Miller v. HickenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hildebrand v. Delta Lumber & Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Zenos v. Britten-Cook Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Anderson v. BleanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Crozer v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.