Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1910No. L.A. No. 2240PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The decision of the district court of appeal for the second district, in this cause, was vacated and the cause transferred to this court, mainly for the purpose of further considering the sufficiency of the assessor's map, made under the provisions of section 3658 of the Political Code, as a means of identification to supply the defects in the descriptions of land in the assessment and the tax-deeds. The trial court found that it was not sufficient and we are satisfied that we cannot disturb that finding. The opinion of Justice Allen, in the district court of appeal, is appended hereto and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Buswell v. Board of Supervisors of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bullock v. RouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stanley v. WestoverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Electrolytic Copper Co. v. Rambler Consol. Mines Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Miller v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Sawyer v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1913
  5. Sinai v. MullCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API