Webber v. Clarke
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
The action is described by the appellant as “an action to quiet the title to a parcel of land described in the complaint, and of ejectment for said lands.”
The plaintiff claims under a school-land patent from the state, dated May 25, 1875, which was issued upon a certificate of purchase dated March 18, 1870.
The defendant claims under a sheriff’s deed executed on February 27, 1874, after a sale under a judgment of a district court, “ duly made and given ” on January 9, 1872, and by adverse possession for the period required by the statute of limitations.
The court below gave judgment…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Coryell v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hibernia Sav. and Loan Soc. v. FarnhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Rydalch v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1910
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.