Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. The facts 'are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
The action in this case was brought originally in the State court of California by Daniel W. Gillette against the Keystone Consolidated Mining Company, the present defendant in error, to recover possession of the east half of section 86, in township 7 north, range 10 east of Mount Diablo meridian, and .in the progress of the case it was transferred to the Circuit Court .of the United States, where judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. The Ivanhoe Mining Company, the plaintiff in error, having been substituted for Gillette, as nis successor in interest, a jury was waived by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sherman v. BuickSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Water and Mining Co. v. BugbeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Work v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- West v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.