Legal Opinion
Faulder v. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 21, 2006No. A115529PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Keith A. Faulder (petitioner) filed a petition for writ of mandate (petition) seeking a stay of the general election for the office of Mendocino County District Attorney scheduled to take place on November 7, 2006, and directing the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors and Mendocino County Assessor-Clerk-Recorder Marsha Wharff (collectively referred to as the County) to cancel the election and to hold a special election, pursuant to Elections Code section 8026. Petitioner claims that the special election provision in section 8026 was triggered when…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles County, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Outfitter Properties, LLC v. Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Los Angeles v. City of Los Angeles Employee Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.