Legal Opinion

Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2011No. S172684PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 583.310,1 which governs the action plaintiff Dana Bruns brought against defendants E-Commerce Exchange, Inc., et al., requires an action “be brought to trial within five years after the action is commenced against the defendant.” Otherwise, dismissal of the action is “mandatory and . . . not subject to extension, excuse, or exception except as expressly provided by statute.” (§ 583.360, subd. (b).) In this case, we must constme two statutory exclusions to the five-year period, specifically those stated in section 583.340, subdivisions (b) and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Moran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Bernard v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Schmeer v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API