Legal Opinion
Outfitter Properties, LLC v. Wildlife Conservation Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 2012No. C065100PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MAURO, J.
The Wildlife Conservation Board (Board) paid $9.98 million from the Habitat Conservation Fund to the federal Bureau of Reclamation for the Battle Creek Salmon and Steelhead Restoration Project. Outfitter Properties, LLC, and Rocky Springs Ranch, LLC (collectively Outfitter), subsequently filed a petition for writ of mandate seeking to vacate the Board’s expenditure decision. The trial court denied the petition.
Outfitter contends on appeal that (1) Fish and Game Code section 2791, subdivision (d) (section 2791(d))1 limits expenditures from the Habitat Conservation Fund to no…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. VieiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Santa Clarita Organization for Planning & the Environment v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- De Vries v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.