Legal Opinion

Union of Med. Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2019No. S238563PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

II. DISCUSSION

A. Governing Law

1. Statutory interpretation

Statutory interpretation is "an issue of law, which we review de novo."

*825( United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co. (2018) 4 Cal.5th 1082, 1089, 232 Cal.Rptr.3d 428, 416 P.3d 792.)

Our overriding purpose in construing a provision of CEQA, as with any statute, is "to adopt the construction that best gives effect to the Legislature's intended purpose." ( California Building Industry Assn. v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369, 381, 196 Cal.Rptr.3d 94, 362 P.3d 792 ( Building Industry ).) In…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pineda v. Williams-Sonoma Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  2. San Francisco Taxi Coalition v. City & County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. All of Us or None etc. v. HamrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Arcadians for Environmental Preservation v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Cal. Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. AragonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API