Legal Opinion

Zaleta v. Town of Fairfield

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 23, 1995No. 13419PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The defendant appeals, pursuant to General Statutes § 31-3011),1 from the decision of the compensation review board of the workers’ compensation commission finding the plaintiff entitled to benefits under the statute providing compensation for heart disease and hypertension to police officers and firefighters, General Statutes § 7-433c.2 On appeal, the defendant claims that the review board improperly determined that the plaintiff’s hypertension was an occupational disease and, therefore, subject to the three year statute of limitations provided in General Statutes § 31-294c.3

*3The following…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Adzima v. UAC/Norden DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Malchik v. Division of Criminal JusticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. Pearce v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Arborio v. Windham Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API