Legal Opinion

Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDEN

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 21, 2010No. SC 18201PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PALMER, J.

This appeal requires us to determine when the one year limitation period of General Statutes § 31-294c (a)1 begins to run on a claim for hypertension benefits under General Statutes § 7-433c.2 The plaintiff, *268David Ciarlelli, appeals3 from the decision of the compensation review board (board), which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the third district (commissioner) dismissing the plaintiffs claim for hypertension benefits under § 7-433c as untimely because the plaintiff had failed to file his claim within one year of what the commissioner…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bakelaar v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Balloli v. New Haven Police Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Brennan v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  3. Carter v. Town of ClintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Holston v. New Haven Police Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  5. Coughlin v. Stamford Fire Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API