Legal Opinion

Discuillo v. Stone & Webster

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 19, 1997No. SC 15581PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue in this certified appeal is whether, under the circumstances of this case, the limitation period within which the plaintiff was required to file his workers’ compensation claim began to run before he actually was aware that the heart attack he had suffered was work-related.1 The plaintiff, Peter Discuillo, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the compensation review board (board). The board had determined that the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) improperly had concluded that the plaintiffs notice of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. In re Baby Z.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Kuehl v. Z-Loda System Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API