Legal Opinion
Arborio v. Windham Police Department
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 14, 2007No. AC 28147PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The plaintiff, Rick E. Arborio, Sr., appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the finding and dismissal of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) in which the commissioner concluded that the plaintiffs claim for benefits under the Heart and Hypertension Act, General Statutes § 7-433c, was untimely. We reverse the board’s decision.
In this appeal, the plaintiff briefed three main issues: “[1] [w]hether a claim for hypertension benefits . . . must be filed within one year after the first manifestation of a symptom ...…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Russell v. Mystic Seaport Museum, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Schmidt v. O. K. Baking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Kuehl v. Z-Loda System Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Malchik v. Division of Criminal JusticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Brocuglio v. Thompsonville Fire District 2Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Conroy v. StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.