Legal Opinion
Adzima v. UAC/Norden Division
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 20, 1979PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.
The plaintiff, widow of the deceased employee, Emil Adzima, appeals from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas sustaining the finding and award of the workmen’s compensation commissioner for the seventh district in denying benefits. The plaintiff’s appeal challenges the denial of her motion to preclude the defendants from asserting a defense, and the denial of her motion to correct the findings of the commissioner.
The material facts are not in dispute: Emil Adzima was employed by United Aireraft/Norden Division, located in Norwalk, Connecticut. On January 4, 1972, he slipped on some oil…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Cecio Bros. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Menzies v. FisherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Brighenti v. New Britain Shirt CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Bird v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Perille v. Raybestos-Manhattan-Europe, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.