Legal Opinion
Pearce v. City of New Haven
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 29, 2003No. AC 22958PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff, Francis Pearce, appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the determination by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) that the *442plaintiffs claim for benefits was untimely. We affirm the board’s decision.
The following facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff, after passing a preemployment physical in 1978, began working for the New Haven fire department. In August, 1988, the plaintiff began seeing Dr. Mark Kasper, his family physician. On August 16, 1988, the plaintiffs blood pressure was taken three times,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Ducharme v. City of PutnamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Morgan v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Black v. London & Egazarian Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kuehl v. Z-Loda System Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Ciarlelli v. TOWN OF HAMDENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hunt v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Arborio v. Windham Police DepartmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Brocuglio v. Thompsonville Fire District 2Connecticut Appellate Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.