Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1942No. Civ. No. 13592PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

This case was tried upon stipulated facts. Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company owns and operates a number of oil wells and plaintiff Las Vegas Land and Water Company owns one well, which is operated for it by its co-plaintiff, drilled from locations within the city of Los Angeles directionally so as to penetrate an oil producing zone at points wholly within the adjoining city of Long Beach. The entire production of the wells comes from this zone and from *826depths of from 3,000 to 4,000 feet. The casing is so perforated and packed that one of the wells produces from a section of the zone in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stone v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Matter of Application of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richfield Oil Corp. v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Martin Ship Service Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Federal Oil Co. v. BrowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Pauley v. FaucettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API