Barker Bros., Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In September, 1934, agents of the City of Los Angeles informed Barker Bros., the owner of a large retail establishment, that, pursuant to the terms of a general occupational license tax ordinance, it must procure a license for carrying on its business for the six months’ period ending at the close of the following December. Thereafter Barker Bros, procured the license by paying the amount of tax demanded, accompanying the payment with a written notice of protest upon the ground that it was not subject to the ordinance. It later brought suit to recover the amount of tax paid and has appealed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State Bd. of Tax Commr's of Ind. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Perez v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.