Legal Opinion

Stone v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1931No. Docket No. 383PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining the appellants from leasing certain tide lands and overflowed lands for the purpose of drilling for oil and gas thereon.

Respondent is a resident and taxpayer of the City of Los Angeles and the owner of real property in what was formerly the city of Venice, which property fronts on Santa Monica Bay. The City of Los Angeles is a municipal corporation organized under a freeholders’ charter. Raymond E. Hoyt is the superintendent and Charles S. Lamb the secretary of the Department of Playground and Recreation of the City of Los Angeles. The other…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Crowe v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. County of Modoc v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Long Beach v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Marden v. RadfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API