Graciosa Oil Co. v. County of Santa Barbara
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, W. S. Day, District Attorney, and R. B. Canfield, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW. J.
This is an action to recover taxes assessed against plaintiff by defendant and paid under protest, claiming that the assessment is void.
For the year 1904 plaintiff was assessed for taxes as the owner of property described on the assessment-roll as “mining rights and privileges under lease made by L. Harris et al., to Graciosa Oil Co., dated December 15, 1900, and recorded in (referring to the record) in and to the following described lands,” (describing about seven thousand acres of land situated in Santa Barbara County). The property rights thus described were assessed at the value…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harvey Coal & Coke Co. v. DillonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Bakersfield & Fresno Oil Co. v. Kern CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago v. People ex rel. WindmillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- State ex rel. Glenn v. Mississippi River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1891
3Cited by61 opinions
- Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
- Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.