Legal Opinion

Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 25, 1962No. Civ. 25464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.

Plaintiff sought a declaration that it was not required to pay to the City of Los Angeles a business license tax as a wholesaler of oil, or as an independent contractor, in addition to the business license tax it was already paying as a producer of oil from wells located in the city. It also sought a refund of taxes which it had paid as a wholesaler of oil. Judgment was in favor of plaintiff. The judgment included an alternative judgment which was to be effective only in the event the judgment, first referred to, did not become final.

Defendant appeals from the judgment.

Appellant contends that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Twin Bell Oil SyndicateSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. La Laguna Ranch Co. v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. City of Berkeley v. CukiermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. ITT Gilfillan, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. City of Los Angeles v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Programming-Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API