Legal Opinion

Pauley v. Faucett

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1954No. Civ. 19741PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

The plaintiff, Edwin W. Pauley, as lessee of an oil and gas lease executed by the decedent Edward P. Shoemaker to one C. C. Potter and assigned by Potter to Pauley, filed this action in interpleader and for declaratory relief in reference to the disposition of royalties accruing under said lease and held by plaintiff. By order of court, accrued and accruing royalties were deposited with the clerk of the court.

The events leading up to the present litigation, chronologically arranged, are as follows:

March 14, 1947, Edward P. and Margaret F. Shoemaker, husband and wife, and owners of the real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Paddock v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Lever v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sayble v. FeinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Bolen v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API