Legal Opinion
In Re Gildea
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1997No. OSB 92-125; SC S42543PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (the Bar) filed an amended formal complaint against the accused on March 3, 1995. The complaint consisted of five causes that alleged a total of 14 violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility (DRs) and two violations of ORS 9.527(4). The accused denied all the allegations. Following a six-day hearing, a trial panel found the accused guilty of four violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility and selected a one-year suspension as the appropriate sanction.
Because the accused’s suspension was for more than 60 days,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BootheOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SousaOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HedgesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandtOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.