Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1994No. OSB 92-12; SC S40452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this disciplinary proceeding is whether the Oregon State Bar (Bar) established by clear and convincing evidence that the accused violated DR 1-102(A)(3) (lawyer shall not engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation); DR 7-102(A)(7) (lawyer shall not assist client in conduct known to be illegal or fraudulent); and ORS 9.527(4) (authorizing discipline for willful deceit or misconduct in the legal profession), by assisting his client in selling and encumbering the client’s assets to defraud the plaintiff in an impending wrongful death action. On de…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rice v. McAlisterOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Reguero v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of DinermanOregon Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flanders & Medeiros, Inc. v. Elizabeth v. BogosianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re GildeaOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hickey v. SettlemierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re Conduct of BarberOregon Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API