Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Claussen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2000No. OSB 96-107; SC S42174PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused lawyer, William J. Claussen, violated Code of Professional Responsibility Disciplinary Rule (DR) 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and DR 7-102(A)(7) (prohibiting counseling or assisting client in conduct that lawyer knows is illegal or fraudulent). The Oregon State Bar (Bar) alleged that the accused violated those ethical rules while representing Jean Wilkinson in a bankruptcy proceeding. Specifically, the Bar contended that, in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Committee of Asbestos-Related Litigants and/or Creditors v. Johns-Manville Corp. (In Re Johns-Manville Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SkagenOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re LawrenceOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HermanOregon Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API