Legal Opinion

Gargano v. Terminix International Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 2001PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoyce, J.

¶ 1 Appellant, Terminix International Co., L.P., appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to a December 1, 2000 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County confirming an arbitration award. We affirm and remand to the trial court for the imposition of appropriate attorney fees and delay damages. The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows.

¶ 2 Appellees, Richard J. and Monicalu-cia Gargano, entered into an agreement of sale with Norris Jackson for the purchase of a home. As this sale was contingent upon Appellees obtaining a “wood destroying insect infestation and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. McKenna v. SossoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. In re M.T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. F.J. Busse Co. v. Sheila Zipporah, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Lundy v. ManchelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API